PostNord delivered its final letter in Denmark on 30 December 2025, bringing an end to more than four centuries of nationwide letter delivery after letter volumes collapsed as most communication moved online.

Just Parcels Now

For the first time since organised postal services were established in Denmark in 1624, the country’s historic national operator no longer delivers domestic letters. From 2026, PostNord says it will now operate in Denmark solely as a parcel carrier, thereby reflecting a structural change in how Danes communicate, receive official information, and interact with public and private services.

A Decision Rooted in Long-Term Decline

PostNord’s decision was not driven by a sudden policy shift but by a sustained and dramatic collapse in letter volumes over the past 25 years. For example, according to figures published by the company, the number of letters handled by PostNord Denmark has fallen by more than 90 per cent since 2000, with volumes continuing to decline rapidly year on year.

In its official announcement, PostNord stated: “Danes have become more and more digital, and what was once sent by letter is now received digitally by the vast majority of people.” The company added that letter volumes “have decreased by over 90 per cent since 2000, and the volume of letters continues to decrease rapidly”.

The pace of decline has accelerated in recent years. PostNord executives have noted that letter volumes fell by around 30 per cent in a single year leading up to the decision, underlining how quickly physical mail has been displaced by digital alternatives.

Denmark’s Digital-First Society

Denmark’s status as one of the world’s most digitalised countries helps explain why the move became unavoidable. Most official communications from public authorities are delivered through Digital Post, an electronic mailbox linked to MitID, Denmark’s national digital identity system. MitID is used for everything from online banking and tax returns to healthcare appointments and document signing.

In fact, around 95 per cent of Danes now receive official correspondence digitally, with only a small minority opting out. As a result, physical letters have increasingly become an exception rather than a default channel, mainly used for niche purposes, formal notifications, or correspondence with people who are exempt from digital systems.

PostNord acknowledged this reality directly, stating that “the letter market is no longer profitable” under current conditions, making continued nationwide letter delivery unsustainable.

From Universal Service to Competitive Market

Denmark’s postal landscape has also changed at a regulatory level. For example, until the end of 2023, the country operated a universal postal service model, under which PostNord was required to deliver letters nationwide at regulated prices. This system ended with the introduction of a new Postal Act in 2024.

The updated legislation opened the letter market to full competition and removed VAT exemptions on letters, pushing up postage prices. At the time of PostNord’s announcement, sending a standard letter could cost as much as 29 Danish krone, making physical mail significantly more expensive relative to digital communication.

PostNord’s managing director in Denmark, Kim Pedersen, has said publicly that higher prices further reduced demand, reinforcing a downward spiral that left letter delivery commercially unviable.

What Changed in 2025?

Throughout 2025, PostNord continued to deliver letters as normal while preparing for its exit. Clear deadlines were set to give households and businesses time to adjust. For example:

– Basic letters, including business letters, direct mail, and magazines, had to be handed in by 18 December 2025.

– More specialised services such as registered letters and letters with return receipt remained available until 29 December.

– The final deliveries took place on 30 December 2025.

Refunds

PostNord also confirmed that postal labels purchased in 2024 or 2025 would be eligible for refunds during a limited period in 2026 if unused, stating: “We’ve made sure that all postal labels purchased in 2024 – or to be purchased in 2025 – can be refunded for a limited time in 2026 if you don’t use them in 2025.”

The Disappearance of the Red Postboxes

One of the most visible consequences of the decision was the removal of Denmark’s iconic red postboxes. From 1 June 2025, PostNord began dismantling the country’s remaining 1,500 mailboxes, with all removals completed by the end of the year.

Each postbox was clearly marked in advance with its planned removal date, and boxes could still be used until taken out of service. PostNord also said it was working to ensure that the postboxes would “have a new purpose” once removed, rather than being discarded.

The removal programme symbolised the practical end of everyday letter posting for most Danes and marked a clear shift away from street-level postal infrastructure.

Impact on Jobs and Operations

The move away from letters had significant workforce implications. For example, around 1,500 jobs were affected in Denmark, out of a total PostNord workforce of roughly 4,600 in the country. While PostNord continues to operate in parcels, letter sorting, delivery, and associated logistics roles were no longer required at previous levels.

PostNord has faced financial pressure for several years, with letter delivery becoming increasingly loss-making as volumes fell and fixed costs remained high.

PostNord Still Operating In Sweden

Importantly, the decision applies only to Denmark. PostNord’s letter operations in Sweden continue unchanged, and the company remains active in the letter market there under different regulatory and market conditions.

Who Delivers Letters Now?

From 1 January 2026, the responsibility for letter delivery has shifted to other operators in the open market, most notably DAO, which already delivered letters prior to PostNord’s exit.

DAO has expanded its operations to handle significantly higher volumes, with customers required to drop letters at designated shops or pay for home collection services. According to Danish law, the option to send physical letters must continue to exist, meaning the government is obliged to ensure that alternative providers remain available.

What About International Mail?

International mail remains a bit of a transitional issue. PostNord was appointed by Denmark’s Ministry of Transport to handle international letters until 31 December 2025. However, responsibility for this service from 2026 onwards is expected to be determined through a separate process.

Groups Most Affected

While the vast majority of Danes rely on digital communication, the end of PostNord’s letter service has raised concerns for groups that still depend on physical mail. For example, advocacy organisations for older people have warned that hospital appointments, care decisions, and other important communications can still arrive by letter for those exempt from Digital Post.

PostNord acknowledged that physical letters will continue to be delivered by other operators, but critics have highlighted that alternative services often require digital payment or app-based interaction, which may present barriers for some users.

A Strategic Move to Parcels

At the centre of PostNord’s decision is a clear strategic refocus. As letter volumes collapsed, parcel deliveries surged due to sustained growth in online shopping. PostNord has said its goal from 2026 is “to become the Danes’ preferred parcel courier”.

In its announcement, the company explained: “We want to be the very best where Danes need us – and that’s in parcels.” The shift aligns PostNord with broader trends across Europe, where national postal operators are increasingly repositioning themselves as logistics and e-commerce delivery companies rather than traditional mail carriers.

The First To Go

The Danish case stands out for the scale and finality of the change. While many European postal services have reduced letter frequency or raised prices, Denmark is the first country to formally conclude that nationwide letter delivery is no longer economically or operationally viable in a fully digital society.

The implications of that decision continue to unfold, both within Denmark and across a continent facing similar pressures on long-established postal systems.

What Does This Mean For Your Business?

Denmark’s decision to end nationwide letter delivery marks a clear acknowledgement that physical mail has moved from being an essential public service to a marginal one in highly digital societies. PostNord’s withdrawal was not driven by sentiment or short-term pressures, but by structural changes in how information is created, distributed, and received. Once most official, financial, and personal communication shifted online, the economics of maintaining a universal letter network no longer held up, even for a long-established national operator.

For businesses, the Danish experience underlines how quickly legacy communication channels can become commercially unviable once digital alternatives reach critical mass. Organisations that still rely on physical letters for billing, notifications, or formal correspondence have been forced to adapt, either by moving processes online or by paying significantly higher costs through alternative providers. This transition has been manageable in Denmark largely because digital infrastructure, digital identity systems, and public adoption were already well established before the postal network was scaled back.

There are clear lessons here for UK businesses and public sector bodies. While the UK remains far more reliant on physical post than Denmark, letter volumes continue to decline, and postal operators are under increasing financial strain. The Danish case shows that once digital communication becomes the default for government and commerce, postal services tend to follow demand rather than tradition. UK organisations may, therefore, need to reassess how dependent they remain on physical mail, particularly for time-sensitive or high-volume communications, and whether existing processes are resilient to future changes in postal service provision or pricing.

Also, the Danish experience highlights the importance of managing transitions carefully for those who cannot easily move online. For example, older people, digitally excluded groups, and organisations that still require physical documentation remain stakeholders in any postal system, even as volumes fall. Ensuring that alternatives remain accessible, affordable, and legally compliant has become a policy challenge rather than a purely operational one.

Denmark’s move does not mean the end of letters altogether, but it does demonstrate that nationwide letter delivery is no longer guaranteed in societies where digital communication dominates. For postal operators, governments, businesses, and citizens alike, the shift marks a practical redefinition of what postal services are for in a digital-first economy, and who they are ultimately designed to serve.

SpaceX says it will move roughly half of the Starlink satellite network into lower orbits during 2026, arguing that the change will materially reduce collision risk and speed up the removal of failed spacecraft as low Earth orbit becomes increasingly congested.

Starlink

Starlink is the satellite broadband network operated by SpaceX, and it has grown into the largest satellite constellation ever deployed. The network now consists of more than 9,000 operational satellites in low Earth orbit, providing internet connectivity to residential, government, and enterprise customers worldwide.

Apples To Just One Layer

The newly announced plan targets one specific layer of the constellation. Starlink vice president of engineering Michael Nicolls said (in a post on X) SpaceX intends to lower all Starlink satellites currently operating at around 550 kilometres above Earth down to approximately 480 kilometres. The migration will involve about 4,400 satellites and will be carried out gradually over the course of 2026.

In his public post on the X platform, Nicolls described the move as “a significant reconfiguration of its satellite constellation focused on increasing space safety”, adding that the lowering will be “tightly coordinated with other operators, regulators, and USSPACECOM”.

What Is Changing And Why It Matters

Low Earth orbit, often shortened to LEO, generally covers altitudes from about 160 km to 2,000 km above Earth. Satellites in this region travel at extremely high speeds, completing an orbit in roughly 90 minutes. LEO is attractive for communications services because it allows lower latency than higher orbits, yet it is also where orbital congestion is now growing most rapidly.

The Starlink satellites affected by this change currently operate at around 550 km and SpaceX now plans to lower them by roughly 70 km. While that difference may appear quite modest, it actually has significant implications for how long satellites remain in orbit if they lose control or suffer a failure.

The Sun’s Activity Cycle

Nicolls linked the decision directly to the Sun’s activity cycle. For example, solar activity follows an approximately 11-year pattern, with higher activity expanding the upper atmosphere and increasing drag on satellites. When solar activity declines towards solar minimum, the upper atmosphere becomes less dense, reducing drag and allowing satellites to remain in orbit for much longer at the same altitude.

“As solar minimum approaches, atmospheric density decreases which means the ballistic decay time at any given altitude increases,” Nicolls wrote on X. “Lowering will mean a >80% reduction in ballistic decay time in solar minimum, or 4+ years reduced to a few months.”

Ballistic decay time refers to how long an uncontrolled satellite takes to naturally lose altitude and re-enter Earth’s atmosphere. For example, a shorter decay time means failed satellites spend less time posing a collision risk to other spacecraft.

Recent Incidents

The announcement follows a rare Starlink satellite incident reported in late 2025. SpaceX said one of its satellites experienced a failure that involved venting propellant, tumbling out of control, and releasing a small amount of debris.

During the incident, the satellite rapidly lost altitude and communications were cut off. SpaceX said the debris consisted of “trackable low relative velocity objects” and that the spacecraft was expected to re-enter the atmosphere within weeks.

Although SpaceX has not said that a collision caused the failure, the incident has drawn attention to the growing difficulty of managing risk in crowded orbital environments. SpaceX has previously said that a Chinese satellite launch came within roughly 200 metres of colliding with a Starlink satellite, underlining how close some encounters in low Earth orbit have become.

Why Lower Orbits Are Seen As Safer

Nicolls has highlighted how lowering Starlink’s 550 km shell would improve safety in several ways, beyond simply speeding up re-entry for failed spacecraft, saying “the number of debris objects and planned satellite constellations is significantly lower below 500 km, reducing the aggregate likelihood of collision.”

For example, a satellite that fails at 550 km during periods of low solar activity could remain in orbit for several years, thereby increasing the time window in which it might be struck by another object. At around 480 km, natural atmospheric drag should pull an uncontrolled satellite down far more quickly, reducing long-term risk.

This approach aligns with broader industry efforts to ensure satellites do not remain in orbit for decades after failure, contributing to the gradual build-up of debris.

Low Earth Orbit Becoming Increasingly Crowded

It’s worth noting here that the number of satellites in low Earth orbit has increased sharply in recent years, largely driven by the rise of large satellite constellations. Starlink alone now accounts for the majority of active satellites in orbit.

Also, other major networks are also in development. For example, Amazon’s Project Kuiper aims to deploy more than 3,000 satellites, while China is understood to be planning multiple LEO constellations that could together exceed 10,000 spacecraft.

With thousands of satellites travelling at several kilometres per second, the risk of collisions has become a central concern for operators and regulators. Even small fragments of debris can cause catastrophic damage at orbital velocities.

These concerns are often discussed in the context of the Kessler Syndrome, i.e., a scenario in which collisions generate debris that triggers further collisions, eventually making certain orbital regions difficult or impossible to use.

Regulatory Scrutiny Is Increasing

Starlink’s orbit-lowering plan comes amid growing regulatory and political scrutiny of large satellite constellations. In the United States, regulators have moved to tighten disposal requirements for satellites in low Earth orbit, shortening the expected time allowed for defunct spacecraft to be removed after the end of their mission. The aim is to reduce the long-term accumulation of debris and lower systemic risk.

Public interest groups have also called for more cautious deployment of megaconstellations. For example, some have urged regulators to pause or more closely examine large LEO projects until the environmental and safety consequences of space congestion are better understood.

Also, concerns extend beyond collisions. For example, scientists have raised questions about the cumulative impact of frequent launches and satellite re-entries on the upper atmosphere, including the release of metals and other materials as spacecraft burn up.

Reliability Claims And Risks Beyond SpaceX’s Control

SpaceX has repeatedly stressed that Starlink satellites are designed to be highly reliable. In fact, Nicolls said there are “only 2 dead satellites” within the operational fleet of more than 9,000.

However, he emphasised that rapid de-orbiting remains important even with strong reliability figures. “If a satellite does fail on orbit, we want it to deorbit as quickly as possible,” he wrote.

Nicolls also highlighted hazards that SpaceX cannot directly control, including “uncoordinated manoeuvres and launches by other satellite operators”. As more constellations are deployed, the behaviour of every operator increasingly affects the safety of the entire orbital environment.

How Will The Migration Be Managed?

SpaceX has not released detailed technical procedures for the migration, but the underlying approach is broadly understood to be that each satellite will use onboard propulsion to gradually adjust its orbit in a controlled manner, lowering altitude while maintaining collision avoidance and tracking.

Nicolls said the process will be carried out in coordination with other satellite operators, regulators, and United States Space Command, which plays a central role in space domain awareness and conjunction warnings.

The movement of thousands of satellites over a single year will be closely watched across the space industry, as it may signal how megaconstellations adapt to rising congestion and evolving expectations around safety and sustainability in low Earth orbit.

What Does This Mean For Your Business?

Lowering thousands of satellites is a clear acknowledgement that congestion in low Earth orbit is no longer a theoretical problem but an operational one. SpaceX’s decision suggests that managing failure scenarios and end of life outcomes is becoming just as important as launch cadence and coverage expansion. Even a relatively small change in altitude can materially reduce how long failed hardware remains a hazard, which matters in an environment where collision risk compounds over time rather than staying static.

The move also sets a practical benchmark for other large constellation operators. For example, as more networks come online, regulators are likely to expect similar evidence that operators are actively reducing long term debris risk rather than relying solely on reliability claims. Coordination with other operators and military tracking bodies signals that large scale orbital changes are now part of routine constellation management, not exceptional events.

For UK businesses and public sector users that rely on satellite connectivity, particularly in rural areas, offshore operations, transport, defence, and emergency services, the announcement points to a more mature phase of satellite internet delivery. A safer and more actively managed orbital environment reduces the risk of service disruption caused by debris events or emergency manoeuvres. It also strengthens the long term viability of satellite broadband as a dependable part of national digital infrastructure rather than a stopgap solution.

For policymakers, insurers, and space regulators, the Starlink reconfiguration highlights where expectations are heading. For example, operators are now being judged not just on coverage and performance but on how responsibly they manage shared orbital space. Decisions made during this phase of LEO expansion will shape what remains usable decades from now, and whether satellite services continue to scale without triggering tighter intervention or enforced limits.

OpenAI has said it is strengthening security in its ChatGPT Atlas browser to reduce the risk of prompt injection attacks, warning the threat is unlikely to ever be fully eliminated.

ChatGPT Atlas includes an agent mode that can read web pages and take actions inside a user’s browser, such as clicking links or sending emails. This makes it a more attractive target for prompt injection attacks, where hidden malicious instructions are used to override the user’s intent.

OpenAI has rolled out a security update with a newly adversarially trained model and stronger safeguards. The changes were driven by automated red teaming, using an internally built AI attacker trained with reinforcement learning to identify complex exploits before they appear in the wild.

The company said prompt injection is a long-term AI security challenge, similar to online scams and social engineering. Industry analysts, including Gartner, have warned that AI browsers could pose significant risks if not tightly controlled.

To reduce exposure, OpenAI advises businesses to limit logged-in use of AI agents, carefully review confirmation requests, and give clear, tightly scoped instructions to reduce the impact of hidden or malicious content.

As climate change drives more frequent and unpredictable drought, scientists are studying resurrection plants to understand how their extreme survival traits could help agriculture become more resilient and sustainable.

What Are Resurrection Plants?

Resurrection plants are a small and exceptional group of flowering plants capable of surviving the loss of more than 90 per cent of their water content, remaining dormant for months before returning to full metabolic activity within hours of rehydration. Out of roughly 352,000 known flowering plant species, only around 240 are known to possess this ability, placing them firmly outside the evolutionary norm.

Where?

Most resurrection plants are found in regions already defined by extreme environmental stress, including southern Africa, parts of Australia, and South America. These landscapes are characterised by rocky slopes, shallow soils, and prolonged dry seasons broken by short, intense rainfall. In such conditions, resurrection plants have evolved to tolerate drought rather than avoid it, resuming growth with little long-term damage once water becomes available again.

How Do They Survive Extreme Dehydration?

At a cellular level, resurrection plants deploy a set of tightly coordinated survival mechanisms. For example, as water is lost, they replace it with sugars such as sucrose, transforming the internal contents of their cells into a glass-like, viscous state. This process, known as vitrification, dramatically slows chemical reactions and protects cellular structures from damage.

During dehydration, the plants also dismantle their photosynthetic machinery, including chloroplasts, effectively switching off photosynthesis to prevent light-induced stress. Protective proteins known as chaperones stabilise membranes and enzymes, helping the plant preserve tissue integrity through prolonged dryness and during the risky process of rehydration.

Similar strategies are seen in desiccation-tolerant organisms such as tardigrades and brine shrimp eggs, but resurrection plants are unique among flowering species in retaining this ability in fully developed leaves and stems.

Why Scientists Are Paying Attention To Them Now

One of the leading figures in resurrection plant research is Jill Farrant, professor of desiccation tolerance at the University of Cape Town. She has spent more than three decades studying how these plants preserve living tissue during extreme drying, describing the process in public lectures and academic commentary as “quite a miracle”.

The growing interest in this field is being driven by climate pressure. For example, droughts are becoming more frequent, more severe, and less predictable. According to the World Meteorological Organisation, drought has intensified globally over the past two decades, with agriculture consistently among the most affected sectors.

In the United States alone, drought, heat, and wildfires caused an estimated $16.6 billion in crop losses in 2023 (according to federal assessments). Also, climate models suggest that by the end of the century, large areas of sub-Saharan Africa, southern Europe, and South America may no longer be suitable for rain-fed agriculture.

The Limits Of Modern Crop Resilience

Modern crops have been bred primarily for yield, speed of growth, and uniformity, often at the expense of resilience. While many crop seeds can tolerate drying during storage, this desiccation tolerance is lost shortly after germination. Once drought strikes during active growth, damage is often permanent.

Carlos Messina, a maize scientist at the University of Florida, has highlighted this problem in published research and public commentary. He has said that maize plants may survive drought, but “when they rehydrate, they don’t go back to the same leaf architecture they had before, and the flow of CO₂ and water is all messed up”, leaving productivity compromised long after rainfall returns. Resurrection plants, by contrast, typically return to their original form and function.

Rethinking Drought Resistance In Crops

For decades, improving drought tolerance in crops has focused on avoidance strategies, such as deeper roots or faster flowering. These approaches help plants escape dry conditions but offer limited protection against sudden or prolonged water loss.

However, it seems that researchers are increasingly concerned about flash droughts, rapid dry periods that occur outside traditional seasonal patterns. For example, Timothy George, a soil scientist at the James Hutton Institute, has described this unpredictability as a defining feature of climate change, making avoidance strategies less reliable.

This has prompted a shift towards exploring whether crops can be engineered or bred to tolerate dehydration itself, rather than simply trying to outgrow it.

Genetic Pathways Without New Genes

Early attempts to transfer resurrection traits into crops seem to have mainly relied on transgenic genetic modification, i.e., inserting genes from unrelated species. While advances in CRISPR gene editing have made such work more precise, regulatory hurdles and public concern remain significant, particularly in Europe.

More recent research suggests that many of the genes involved in desiccation tolerance already exist within crop genomes, especially in seeds. Farrant and others argue that the challenge lies in reactivating these genetic programmes in mature plants, rather than introducing foreign DNA.

This work is increasingly supported by modern tools such as RNA sequencing, which allows scientists to track which genes are switched on and off during dehydration, and high-throughput plant phenotyping, which uses sensors and imaging systems to monitor stress responses in real time. Together, these technologies are helping researchers identify which genetic pathways matter most, and when they need to be activated.

Julia Buitink, a seed biologist at the French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment, has described this approach as technically feasible but biologically complex. In published research and interviews, she has stressed that activating stress-response genes often affects multiple plant systems at once, frequently reducing yield, which remains a critical concern for farmers.

Evidence From Targeted Genetic Studies

A notable proof-of-concept study emerged back in 2018, when researchers in Kenya and Sweden introduced a single gene from the resurrection plant Xerophyta viscosa into sweet potato. The gene, XvAld1, plays a role in antioxidant defence.

Under controlled drought conditions, the modified plants remained greener, lost fewer leaves, and continued growing longer than unmodified plants. Crucially, they showed no visible differences under normal watering conditions, suggesting drought protection could be activated without harming everyday growth.

The Role Of Microbiomes In Drought Survival

It’s worth noting here that genetics isn’t the only avenue being explored. For example, the plant root microbiome, or rhizosphere, has become a growing area of interest in drought research. Scientists are investigating whether microbial communities associated with resurrection plants help them tolerate extreme stress.

In fact, Farrant’s team has begun mapping the rhizosphere of Myrothamnus flabellifolia, a woody resurrection plant capable of surviving up to nine months without water. A 2024 study identified more than 900 distinct bacterial and fungal groups associated with its roots, raising the possibility that some drought tolerance traits could be transferred via microbial partnerships rather than genetic modification.

Teff And Its Resurrection Plant Relative

Another promising research pathway involves teff, a cereal grown for thousands of years in Ethiopia. Teff is naturally drought tolerant and has a close evolutionary relative, Eragrostis nindensis, which is itself a resurrection plant.

Comparative studies suggest that differences in sunlight protection, including antioxidant production and surface pigments that act like natural sun protection, may explain why one species survives extreme drought while the other does not. Understanding which traits were lost or silenced during domestication could inform future breeding or gene regulation strategies.

A Broader Sustainability Question

It seems that resurrection plants are no longer viewed as botanical curiosities, but more as representing a living archive of survival strategies largely set aside during the twentieth century’s drive for high-yield agriculture. Therefore, as climate pressures intensify, researchers are now increasingly questioning whether resilience, even at the cost of some productivity, may become essential for sustaining food systems in an increasingly unpredictable world.

What Does This Mean For Your Organisation?

The recent research around resurrection plants seems to point to a clear recalibration in how drought resilience is being approached, moving away from simply trying to avoid water stress and towards learning how plants can survive it without lasting damage. Rather than offering a single technological fix, this body of work highlights a combination of genetics, gene regulation, advanced sensing technologies, and microbiome science that together could reshape how crops cope with increasingly erratic conditions.

For farmers and agricultural supply chains, this matters because climate volatility is no longer a distant risk but a present operational challenge. Technologies such as RNA sequencing and real-time plant phenotyping are already helping researchers identify which traits genuinely improve recovery after drought, rather than just short-term survival. Over time, that knowledge could inform breeding programmes that prioritise stability and recovery, particularly in regions where rainfall can no longer be relied upon.

There are also some clear implications for UK businesses. For example, food producers, processors, and retailers are increasingly exposed to climate-driven supply disruption, even when crops are grown overseas. More resilient crop varieties could help stabilise yields, reduce price volatility, and support long-term procurement planning. Agri-technology firms, seed developers, and data-driven farming platforms also stand to benefit as demand grows for tools that monitor plant stress, optimise inputs, and support more resilient production systems.

At the same time, the research highlights the trade-offs involved. For example, improving resilience can come at the cost of yield, and regulatory barriers around genetic technologies remain significant, particularly in Europe. For policymakers, investors, and sustainability leaders, the challenge will be balancing innovation with public trust, food affordability, and environmental responsibility.

Taken together, resurrection plants offer less of a blueprint and more of a reference point. They show that extreme resilience is biologically possible, and that modern technology is making it easier to understand how it works. Whether that knowledge can be translated into scalable, acceptable, and economically viable solutions will shape not just future agriculture, but the resilience of food systems that UK businesses and consumers ultimately depend on.

OpenAI have recently made it easier than ever to find the best deal online for a product you’re after. By adding ‘Shopping Research’ to ChatGPT’s menu, you can now sit back and take the time and sweat out of looking for the bargains, as this video explains.

[Note – To Watch This Video without glitches/interruptions, It may be best to download it first]

Boost productivity, stay on top of your work, and never miss a deadline again by turning emails into to-do items or calendar events instantly. Here’s how:

How to do it:

– Open Outlook and select the email you want to convert, such as a meeting request, a task assignment, or a reminder from a colleague.

– Drag the email to the Tasks icon (it looks like a clipboard with a checkmark) at the bottom of the navigation pane to create a task.

– Or, drag it to the Calendar icon to schedule an event.

Why it helps – Quickly turn emails into actionable items, keep your tasks and calendar in sync, and stay on top of your work.